SBGOK is not a law firm. Every claim that needs representation is taken by an independent qualified lawyer from our panel, engaged on contingency and named to the claimant before anything is signed. We are always looking for more — and for the researchers and case assistants who make their files winnable.
Listed with each lawyer’s written consent
Each of these lawyers holds their own practising qualification and professional indemnity cover, and acts under their own engagement terms. Claimants are told which lawyer holds their file, and can ask for the reasoning behind that allocation.
Commercial litigation with a decade of licensing and payments work in the Dutch Caribbean. Sets allocation policy and reviews every declined-then-appealed file.
Consumer and financial services disputes. Leads on cross-border enforcement where the operating entity and the paying entity are not the same company.
Regulatory practice, formerly in-house at a licensed operator. Reads terms and bonus conditions the way the people who wrote them do.
Self-exclusion and duty-of-care claims. Built the argument structure we now use where an exclusion request was never applied across sister brands.
Payments and chargeback disputes, with a subspecialty in tracing funds through processors that have since exited the sector.
Handles matters where the operator will engage but not litigate. Roughly a third of resolved files never reach a filing.
The people who build the file before it reaches counsel: intake review, entity research, evidence structuring, chronology.
This is a young field with very little settled practice and a claimant population that has been told for years that nothing can be done. The lawyers who build the record now are the ones the field will cite later.
We do the unglamorous part: intake screening, entity tracing, evidence structuring, chronology, correspondence log. You get files that arrive complete, and you keep the professional relationship and the credit.
No retainer, no hourly billing, no cost to the claimant up front. Counsel is paid from recovery, on terms agreed per matter before the file is accepted.
Law students, trainees, paralegals and career researchers who want real files rather than filing. You will read operator terms nobody has read carefully, trace corporate structures built not to be traced, and turn a claimant’s chaotic year of screenshots into a chronology a lawyer can argue from.
Work is remote and by the matter. Everyone gets a named supervisor on the panel, a written reference on completion, and their name on the internal file — the same credit line counsel gets.
Read operator terms across versions, find the clause that was actually relied on, and evidence when it changed. This is the work that decides a third of our withheld-winnings files.
You enjoy finding the one sentence that contradicts the other twelve, and you are meticulous about dates and versions.
Trace the entity behind a brand through registries, licence records, domain history and payment descriptors, to the company that can actually be sued.
You have used a company registry for fun, and you record where every fact came from without being asked.
Turn a claimant’s year of screenshots, emails and chat logs into a dated chronology counsel can argue from, and identify what is missing before the file goes out.
You are organised, patient with distressed people, and comfortable saying a document does not prove what someone hopes it proves.
Support our published analysis: source checks, regulator monitoring, and drafting the “why this matters” note that sits under shared industry reporting.
You write clearly, you check things twice, and you can tell the difference between a finding and an allegation.
